| Name Of Lots | Units | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Lot 1: Procurement of PET-CT | 9 | €41,605,941.18 |
| Lot 2: Procurement of PET-CT | 4 | €18,491,529.41 |
| No. | Date of Received | Question | Responses | Part (RFB) | Cluster | Sub Cluster |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024-10-25 | 2) Is it possible that if the NIE holder issues the bidder the authorization letter to the bidder, to declare that the bidder is authorized to import the goods in the Contract? So that the bidder could be exempted from the tax. Thank you for your attention, looking forward to your reply. |
2. This project will receive tax exemptions and mechanism has been prepared to handle import taxes, VAT, and other customs duties under the current project. Once there is a notification of the successful bidder, MoH will submit a tax exemption request to the Ministry of Finance for the specified bidder, and will assist the successful bidder throughout the process. | Contract | Contract Management | Taxes |
| 2 | 2024-10-25 | Dear Procurement Committee 5 - IHSS, MoH, Hope this email finds you well. This XXX, I am writing to you on behalf of my company XXX. We have 2 questions regarding Procurement of PET CT, please kindly clarify, thank you. 1) If the product we are going to quote / submit has already been registered in Indonesia, but the bidder / JV member is not the license(NIE) holder, can goods be imported directly through the leading party of the JV rather than through the license holder? If not, it seems it is a must that the bidder has to form a JV with the license holder (the local company) , just for the tax exemption, Am I correct? |
1) A mechanism has been prepared to handle import taxes, VAT, and other customs duties under the current project. You may imported directly or JV with the license holder. In this case the successful bidder must possess an NIE from the country of origin where the product is manufactured before signing contract. Therefore, the NIE and contracts experience documents, even if they are official documents in Bahasa Indonesia, should be translated into English to comply with this requirement. | Bidding Procedure | Procurement Regulations | Eligible Bidders (including joint venture) |
| 3 | 2024-10-30 | Dear Procurement Committee 5 - IHSS, MoH, Hope this email finds you well. This is XXXX, I am writing to you on behalf of my company. We have one question regarding performance security. Please kindly clarify and , thank you. 1) on the page 42 of the tender document, it says "If the Performance Security furnished by the successful Bidder is in the form of a bond, it shall be issued by a bonding or insurance company that has been determined by the successful Bidder to be acceptable to the Purchaser. A foreign institution providing a bond shall have a correspondent financial institution located in the Purchaser’s Country." The offering currency of our bid will be Chinese Yuan, and if we are awarded the contract, we would like to provide the Purchaser with the performance guarantee issued by a bank located in China, which will be unconditional and using the form as provided in the tender documents. Is it acceptable? Or will the Purchaser require the issuing bank located in China must have a correspondent bank or the affiliated bank in Indonesia to issue the counter guarantee? The reason why we ask this question is because the counter guarantee Thank you. Thank you for your attention, looking forward to your reply. Best Regards, |
Regarding your question on the performance security and the acceptance of a guarantee issued by a bank located in China, we would like to clarify the following: The Performance Security, if provided in the form of a bond, must be issued by a bank that is acceptable to the Purchaser. This includes bonds issued by foreign institutions. In the case of a bond being issued by a foreign institution (such as a Chinese bank), the institution must have a correspondent financial institution located within the Purchaser's country (Indonesia). This is to ensure that the performance security can be effectively enforced if needed. Therefore, for the performance guarantee to be acceptable, the bank issuing the bond in China must have a correspondent or affiliated bank in Indonesia. This will allow for smooth processing and fulfillment of the security requirements. We hope this clarifies your query. Should you need further information, please do not hesitate to reach out |
Bidding Procedure | Procurement Regulations | Procurement Methodology |
| 4 | 2024-10-30 | Dear Procurement Committee 5 - IHSS, MoH, Hope this email finds you well. This is XXXX, I am writing to you on behalf of my company XXXX. We have one question regarding Procurement of PET CT, please kindly clarify, thank you. 1) In Row 11, which is green cell, it says U.S.FDA Clearance, CE Mark (Conformité Européenne mark)(MDD), or other health, safety and environmental standard adherence, and the requirement says mandatory if NIE not allotted as yet. Bidder to provide evidence. Our product has been registered in China, but has not obtained U.S.FDA Clearance, CE Mark and NIE, is it acceptable if we offer such product only with NMPA (National Medical Products Administration of China)? Additionally if NMPA is not recognized / accepted, will it be recognized / accepted if we provide ISO certificates, such as ISO 13485, ISO 9001, ISO 45001 and ISO 14001 as a substitute for U.S.FDA Clearance, CE Mark or NIE ? Please kindly advise us, thank you. Thank you for your attention, looking forward to your reply. Best Regards, |
Thank for your question. Bidder must provide U.S. FDA Clearance, CE Mark (Conformité Européenne mark) (MDD), or other health, safety and environmental standard adherence | Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 5 | 2024-11-04 | Dear Sir/Madam, Related to the Specific Procurement Notice (SPN) that was released: RFB number: KS.01.02/A.VI/6113/2024 Contract title: Procurement of PET CT Lot 1: Procurement of PET CT ( 9 Units ) Lot 2: Procurement of PET CT ( 4 Units ) We have the attached input/questions for submission to the Procurement Committee. We urge MOH, ISDB and the World Bank to please consider the critical input from us and to make the necessary adjustments/revisions to the technical specifications. We acknowledge and appreciate that the Procurement Committee, MOH and ISDB are highly committed and working very diligently for the project – in recognition of that and in order to ensure a successful RFB process that attracts the submission of high-quality bids from the market, we kindly request the Procurement Committee, MOH and ISDB to kindly: 1. please release answers, feedback and technical specification revisions no later than 7 calendar days after receipt of the questions/input and/or at the latest 10 calendar days before bid submission deadline, as the information shared with the market are very pertinent, impactful and in many cases, mandatory (e.g. technical specifications sheet) for individual bidder’s bid preparation We believe early notice will be helpful for all stakeholders involved and reduce health stresses from short notice updates/changes. Our requests are in connection to ensure good, fair, transparent and healthy participation of the entire market for an eventual successful tender process for the ultimate benefit of the people of Indonesia. |
Thank you for your feedback. MOH (Purchaser) will respond to bidders' clarifications at least 5 (five) days before the deadline of bid submission to ensure sufficient time for the prospective bidder to prepare and submit its bid. If any changes are communicated close to the bid submission date, an extension of time will be included in the amendment. Please also be advised that late requests for clarification will not be reviewed and responded to. All guidance and documents have been published on the IHSS public website: https://ihss.kemkes.go.id/ Any amendments (if any) and responses to questions will be published there as well |
Bidding Procedure | Procurement Regulations | Procurement Methodology |
| 6 | 2024-11-04 | 3. please stagger submission deadlines of all and individual on-going ISDB-related RFBs wider apart, minimally 1 calendar week from each other | Thank you for your the input. The Bid Submission schedule that has been shared by the MoH on the website: https://ihss.kemkes.go.id/ will remain as scheduled. As per this schedule, bidders may choose to comply or not. Any amendments (if any) and responses to questions will also be published there. | Bidding Procedure | Procurement Regulations | Procurement Methodology |
| 7 | 2024-11-04 | Technical Specifications – Row 273 Criteria: extension of warranty duration Remarks: Is the warranty only covering the main equipment or must be covering all accessories? |
Many thanks for this feedback. As this specification is mandatory, the bidder can choose to comply and describe. The warranty should cover the main equipment and all accessories. | Contract | Contract Management | Warranty |
| 8 | 2024-11-04 | 1. Manufacturing Experience in RFB Procurement of CT Simulator Section III Evaluation and Qualification Criteria (page 55): Criteria: Manufacturing experience and Technical Capacity: For the items under the Contract that the bidder is a manufacturer, the Bidder shall furnish documentary evidence to demonstrate that: (i) it has manufactured CT Simulator for at least seven (7) years, prior to the bid submission deadline; and (ii) its annual production capacity of CT Simulator for each of the last seven (7) years prior to the bid submission deadline, is at least 50% the quantities specified under each lot. Remarks: To ensure the tender openness towards larger range of manufacturers, Bidder would like to raise that the technologies represent specialized segments within the broader category of CT scanners. The existing requirements may inadvertently limit participation in the tender process, effectively narrowing the pool of potential bidders to a few large companies, such as XXXX. We believe that revising these requirements to consider the unique expertise and capabilities of smaller, specialized manufacturers could foster a more competitive bidding environment. This would not only encourage innovation but also potentially result in more favorable pricing and options for the Ministry. We respectfully urge the Ministry to reconsider the manufacturing experience criteria for this niche market, allowing a broader range of qualified manufacturers to participate. This approach could enhance the overall quality and availability of advanced imaging technologies within Indonesia. |
This question is not related to PET-CT Package | Other | Unrelated Questions | Unrelated Questions |
| 9 | 2024-11-04 | 2. please give early announcement for new/extended submission deadline that is issued at least 10 days before the actual new/extended deadline itself | Please refer to the respective response on the question #5. | Bidding Procedure | Procurement Regulations | Procurement Methodology |
| 10 | 2024-11-04 | I've read and study the Technical Specification of Procurement of PET CT, I don't see any specific request for digital or analog PET-CT. With the budget that MoH have for PET-CT, USD 5.239.267/Unit, MoH should ask for Digital PET-CT with SiPM Detector, compared to analog PET-CT which is using the technology from more than 10 years ago. It would be more reasonable if MoH requested digital PET-CT, considering the budget MoH have. |
Thank you for your feedback. MoH is considering your feedback to forthcoming amendment. | Other | Related to Proc Plan and Packaging Arr. | Unrelated Questions |
| 11 | 2024-11-05 | Dear Procurement Committee, We have some requests for the Technical part of Specifications. Our request is to change some technical requirements in the Technical Specification for Procurement of PET CT. RFB No: KS.01.02/A.VI/6113/2024 To this request, please consider to change as below (Or please check the "pdf" attachment): Please add the following spec: Technical Specifications – Row 33, Criteria : Type of the PET detectors Suggestion : SiPM Remarks : Digital PET/CT is the main trend, all the new installations of PET/CT in Europe, USA and China are digital ones. The most significant symbol of digital PET/CT is the SiPM. Digital PET/CT brings higher image quality, faster scanning and lower dose for patients, which means we can improve our own capability of diagnosing and treating the cancer, more patients can cure themselves in our own country, no need to travel abroad, meanwhile, increase daily patient throughput, lower dose and operating cost can also help hospitals earn more money to strengthen ourselves. These benefit cannot be brought by dBGO Analog PET/CT. There are many papers compared digital and analog PET/CT, for example: For Image quality and lesion detection: Comparison of image quality and lesion detection between digital and analog PET/CT. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 46(6), 1383 1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-4260-z For dose reduction: Digital PET/CT allows for shorter acquisition protocols or reduced radiopharmaceutical dose in [18F]-FDG PET/CT. Annals of nuclear medicine, 35(4), 485–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01588-6 Moreover, at present, according to the budget of the ISDB project for nuclear medicine imaging products, it is enough to support Indonesia's nuclear medicine department to a higher level. We do not want the Ministry of Health to purchase analog technology products that are more than 10 years old. This is not good for the development of nuclear medicine in Indonesia, and will make Indonesia lag behind the global average level of nuclear medicine in the future. And this gap will become larger and larger Sincerely, |
Please refer to the respective response on the question #10. | Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 12 | 2024-11-05 | Technical Specifications – Row 172, Criteria : Phantoms Suggestion : Bidder to supply complete set for performance evaluation, quality assurance and quality control. Bidder to supply the following according to IAEA standards, but not limited to: 1. CTDI Phantom 2. Image Quality Phantom Remarks : Please kindly clarify the "CTDI Phantom Set" - Only Phantom? - Including CTDI testing phantome and equipment. The equipment is quite expensive to affect the total cost of our offering |
The bidder will be required to provide the full set for Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) testing, which at least includes: 1. A sensor/testing equipment for CTDI measurements 2. Various sizes of CTDI phantom cylinders, which capable of simulate the head and body of both adult and pediatric patients Bidder shall be suggested to supply complete set of CTDI testing phantom for performance evaluation, quality assurance and quality control, according to IAEA standard |
Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 13 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specifications – Row 188 Criteria : consumables needed Remarks: Bidder to supply quantity for 100 typical patients. Suggestion: Please share the full list of consumables with required quantity for 100 patient studies. |
The specification is an informational specification, to request bidders to provide their own list of consumables that they need to provide that is relevant to support the PET-CT system. | Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 14 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specifications – Row 38 Criteria : Ring Diameter, cm ; Preferred; ≥ 80 cm Remarks: The PET Ring Diameter is an important parameter to bring the best system performance. NEMA sensitivity is greatly dependent on Ring diameter. The smaller the ring, the better NEMA sensitivity. Hence the Ring diameter should be less than 80cm to gain more benefit on system performance. Suggestion: Preferred; ≤ 80 cm |
Many thanks for this feedback. As this specification is rated criteria, the bidder can choose to comply or not. MoH will retain the current specification. NEMA sensitivity is a standard measurement that quantifies the ability of the PET scanner to detect radiation emitted from a known source (such as a patient injected with radioisotope). Other than ring diameter, its sensitivity is also dependent on the detector's technology/ configuration and scanner geometry. A larger ring diameter allows the PET-CT system to have larger detector which allows more radiation captured/detected per scan, leading to a greater axial field of view (FOV). This results in a higher NEMA sensitivity and overall higher PET scan performance |
Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 15 | 2024-11-06 | PET-CT Technical Specifications – Row 65, Criteria : Type Suggestion : SiPM Remarks : Digital PET/CT is the main trend, all the new installations of PET/CT in Europe, USA and China are digital ones. The most significant symbol of digital PET/CT is the SiPM. Digital PET/CT brings higher image quality, faster scaning and lower dose for patients, which means we can improve our own capability of diagnosing and treating the cancer, more patients can cure themselves in our own country, no need to travel abroad, meanwhile, increase daily patient throughput, lower dose and operating cost can also help hospitals earn more money to stengthen ourselves. These benefit cannot be brought by dBGO Anolog PET/CT. There are many papers compared digital and analog PET/CT, for example: For Image quality and lesion detection: Comparison of image quality and lesion detection between digital and analog PET/CT. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 46(6), 1383 1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-4260-z For dose reduction: Digital PET/CT allows for shorter acquisition protocols or reduced radiopharmaceutical dose in [18F]-FDG PET/CT. Annals of nuclear medicine, 35(4), 485–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01588-6 |
Please refer to the respective response on the question #10. | Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 16 | 2024-11-06 | PET-CT Technical Specifications – Row 63, Criteria : Timing resolution, psec, ≤ 565 psec Suggestion : ≤ 500 ps Remarks : TOF resolution should be smaller than 500ps, then could have good performance. |
Many thanks for this feedback. As this specification is mandatory, the bidder can choose to comply or not. MoH will retain the current specification. | Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 17 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specifications – Row 214 Criteria : system upgradeable in the future Remarks: Software and hardware updates and upgrades at no cost System software update will provide necessary software update on regular basis to keep up the system up to date. The hardware upgrade and software upgrades are open specification which involves larger hardware upgrade including operation cost impact to the hospital. To provide more benefits to hospital, future onsite upgradable model of PET is preferred to handle more patients and less radiation dose to patients with larger axial field of view. Suggestion : changing to software updates at no cost. Optional line with score: Onsite upgradable PET detectors for future ready to handle more patients with less dose. |
Many thanks for this feedback. As this specification is mandatory, the bidder can choose to comply or not. MoH will retain the current specification. This requirement encourages bidders to provide the latest technology when offering a model, with delivered equipment to include the latest hardware and software technology. This ensure hospitals to function with the latest technology advancement able to be offered by the bidders, thus providing quality healthcare. |
Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 18 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specification row 126: Criteria: Reconstruction time Remarks: To ensure clarity, Bidder would like to clarify whether the requirements refer to the reconstruction time after one patient bed scanning. |
Bidder is suggested to provide explanation/answer based on the model provided. This is under the CT specification section, refers to the amount of time to reconstruct an image after one procedure scan. |
Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 19 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specification row 95-113 and row 135-145: Criteria: Radiation Dose, Advanced Image Acquisition, Image Processing Remarks: To ensure clarity, Bidder would like to clarify whether the requirements are for CT part only or not. |
Yes. This is under the CT specification section. Note: The CT scan output provides the image of anatomy using X-ray radiation while PET detects the radiation emitted from the patient (patient is injected with radioisotope). Radiation dose specification refers to the ability of the CT scan to reduce radiation exposure to the patient. Advanced image acquisition conducts correction techniques such as respiratory gating, cardiac gating, and real-time tracking of patient movement help reduce artifacts. Image Processing refers to a functionality in the CT component. Image processing in CT scanning plays a critical role in improving the quality, accuracy, and clinical value of the images generated. |
Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 20 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specifications – Row 39 Criteria : crystal material: Either LSO, LYSO, LBS, or dBGO bidder to list. Remarks: BGO crystal has intrinsic property of higher stopping power, which converts into higher NEMA Sensitivity. NEMA Sensitivity helps to reduce dose, time and small lesion detection. BGO crystal with SiPM technology offer superior NEMA Sensitivity approximately 30% higher than PMT (Photomultiplier system) Suggestion: Either; LSO, LYSO, LBS or BGO Bidder to list |
Many thanks for this feedback. As this specification is mandatory, the bidder can choose to comply or not. MoH will retain the current specification. Crystal materials (such as dBGO, LSO & LYSO) provides shorter decay time, higher light yield, better timing resolution and better time-of-flight. BGO crystal with SiPM technology refers to dBGO which complies to Row 39. Note: Crystals in PET-CT serve as scintillators, materials that convert the energy from incoming gamma rays into visible light, which is then detected to produce images. dBGO is preferred to BGO to avoid analog models. |
Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 21 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specifications – Row 83 Criteria : Total detector width, z-axis, mm ≥ 19 mm Remarks: The better CT detector coverage offers shorter scan time, faster rotation time for advanced CT clinical applications. All vendors offer 38mm and above in their portfolio, hence it’s beneficial to hospital to ask for 38mm or above, otherwise kindly allow the vendors to offer 38mm and above as optional with additional score. Suggestion: >= 38mm or above |
Many thanks for this feedback. As this specification is mandatory, the bidder can choose to comply or not. MoH will retain the current specification. The current specification is inclusive of various PET-CT models, with different technologies. Bidder is able to suggest total detector width wider than the mandatory requirement. |
Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 22 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specifications – Row 175 to 184 Criteria : Accessories Preferred Remarks: If the goals is enabling the center to be ready to operate the PETCT, there are other mandatory accessories based on BAPETEN regulation that still not mentioned in the specification. Please find Annexure document as attachment for the full list of accessories required for operation license. Suggestion: Add all mandatory accessories based on BAPETEN regulation and make it as green. |
Many thanks for this feedback. As this specification is rated criteria, the bidder can choose to comply or not. MoH will retain the current specification. The bidder to provide all equipment necessary to meet BAPETEN regulations for PET-CT operations. BAPETEN requirement i.e., IAEA standards includes the following equipment that is used for periodic calibration during operation of PET-CT such as: - point source of a long-lived isotope within a scattering material - 20cm cylindrical uniform phantom - Laser alignment tool - Manufacturer supplied phantom |
Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 23 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specifications – Row 65 Criteria : ≥ 32 slices, or equivalent Remarks: The digital PETCT scanners in the market offers high end CT scanner by all vendors to increase the clinical capability of advanced PETCT scanner. There are clinical benefits of 128slice CT with routine diagnostic CT application with minimum 64 rows of detector for faster acquisition with low dose. It will be more beneficial to all routine PETCT clinical cases. 128 Slice CT on PETCT will also help to perform routine Cardiac CT or diagnostic CT which allows the hospital to use it as backup Diganostic CT scanner. Suggestion: >= 128 Acquired Slices |
Many thanks for this feedback. As this specification is mandatory, the bidder can choose to comply or not. MoH will retain the current specification. A PET-CT of ≥ 32 slices, or equivalent is able to provide the anatomical correlation. Bidder is able to comply should a 128 slice model be provided. Note: A CT scanner provides anatomic correlation to the physiologic activity captured by PET. A basic CT scan would be sufficient to capture the anatomy. |
Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 24 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specifications – Row 201 Criteria : operation time for UPS Remarks: Estimated Operation Time, minutes: preferred at least 60 minutes. We request the committee to change the specification as at least 10 minutes which is good enough to store the patients’ studies and complete the ongoing PET studies without data loss. 60 minutes back up will need more space for the installation of the battery and increase maintenance cost Suggestion : operation time 10 minutes back up. |
Many thanks for this feedback. MoH has considered this input and will update the specification and included in a forthcoming amendment to the specifications. | Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 25 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specifications – Row 63 Criteria : timing resolution, psec <= 565 psec Remarks: Time of flight PET offers better Signal to Noise Ratio. The next development of Time-of-Flight technology is based on Deep learning TOF based on SiPM based Digital PET technology, which offer same benefit as TOF technology. Alternatively, NEMA sensitivity also improves SNR, reduce patient dose, reduce acquisition time, and detect small lesions. Hence both TOF and higher NEMA sensitivity should be considered for better SNR. Suggestion: timing resolution, psec: <= 565 psec or equivalent technology to improve Signal to Noise Ratio. |
Many thanks for this feedback. As this specification is mandatory, the bidder can choose to comply or not. MoH will retain the current specification. This specification refers to the timing resolution performance that the PET-CT needs to comply to, not the technology that supports it. Time of flight (TOF) measures the very small differences in time between events, which enables more spatial information to be inferred from the coincidence detection events. The result is that much shorter exam times are possible without decreasing the image quality. Bidder can specify their equivalent technology under the specification in Row 62 "Time of flight, or equivalent", which still can allow them to comply to the mandatory specification. |
Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 26 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specifications – Row 232 Criteria : MRI compatible medical gas panel and waveguides within RF cabin Remarks: MRI compatible medical gas panel and waveguides within RF cabin Suggestion: Kindly remove this line as the specification is only applicable for MRI scanners. |
Many thanks for this feedback. MoH has considered this input and will update the specification and included in a forthcoming amendment to the specifications. Rows 231 to 233 is intended to be removed as it is unapplicable to the technical specification. |
Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 27 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specifications – Row 35 and 36, Criteria : Number of detector rings: 3, Number of detector rings: Preferred; ≥ 20 Remarks: Clarification on detector rings. Term “ring” is describing the axial FOV (field of view). For example 1 ring will be equal to 5 cm or 4 cm axial FOV depends on vendor. Since 1 ring in vendor A will be different from vendor B or C. Recently, the nomenclature of PET detector coverage changed from “Ring concept to Axial Field of View” to compare the equivalent models. Based on the technical specification axial FOV already mentioned in Line No. 41 and 42. Suggestion: removing Line No. 35 and 36 due to redundancy. |
Thank you for your feedback. MoH is considering your feedback to forthcoming amendment. | Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 28 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specifications – Row 34, Criteria : Detector Assembly Remarks: Need clarification regarding the type of PETCT whether it is digital PETCT or analogue PETCT. Based on latest technology update, most of new PETCT installation in Indonesia or across the globe are digital PETCT. Digital PETCT offers additional clinical benefits such as increasing system sensitivity for faster scan and lower patient dose, also improving detection of small lesion. The main differentiator between digital PETCT and analogue PETCT is the change in type of detector from PM (Photomultiplier) tube to SiPM (Silicon Photomultiplier). To avail latest technology with advanced clinical benefit to patients, it’s requested to add additional feature as SiPM based PET detector. All vendors in the market offers SiPM based Digital PETCT scanner. Propose amendment: Additional line under Detector assembly: SiPM detector based with higher performance parameters & clinical benefits. |
Please refer to the respective response on the question #10. | Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 29 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specifications – Row 68 Criteria : Heat storage, MHU ≥ 4 MHU Remarks: The higher tube capacity offers better CT performance with whole body continuous helical scans which allows advanced clinical applications for hybrid PETCT and stand-alone CT applications. In case of no change in heat storage specs from ≥ 4 MHU, it’s beneficial to the hospital to allow the vendors to offer 7MHU as optional with additional score. Suggestion: >= 7MHU or above |
Many thanks for this feedback. As this specification is mandatory, the bidder can choose to comply or not. MoH will retain the current specification. A PET-CT heat storage current specification covers ranges of PET-CT models at MHU ≥ 4 MHU. This allows the bidder to comply at MHU ≥ 7 MHU should this model be provided. Note: The heat storage (of the x-ray tube in PET-CT) performance is used to measure the maximum heat buildup that an x-ray tube can withstand before sustaining damage, expressed in MHU (mega heat units). Heat storage may vary depending on heat dissipation rate of the x-ray tube on the PET-CT model, where a model with higher dissipation rate will not require higher heat storage as it will cool down itself before heating up above the heat storage capacity. |
Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 30 | 2024-11-06 | Technical Specifications – Row 268 Criteria: acceptance testing & commissioning Remarks: Bidder must perform acceptance testing & commissioning in accordance to IAEA or NEMA standards following BAPETEN requirements. In current practice BAPETEN requirements for acceptance and commissioning is aligned with international standards. Kindly amend the specs to perform acceptance and commissioning test accordance to Bapeten. Suggestion: Bidder must perform acceptance testing & commissioning in accordance with BAPETEN requirements. |
Many thanks for this feedback. As this specification is mandatory, the bidder can choose to comply and describe. MoH will retain the current specification. The current specification mentions acceptance testing and commissioning to be done in accordance BAPETAN standards which follows international standards such as IAEA and NEMA standards. Hence, if the bidder can conduct acceptance testing and commissioning in accordance with BAPETAN requirements, the bidder complies to the requirement. |
Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 31 | 2024-11-18 | Dear, Ministry of Health Attention: Procurement Committee 5 - IHSS, MoH (Procurement of PET CT) Address: Prof. Dr. Sujudi 14th Floor, Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Blok X-5 Kav. 4-9 Jakarta 12950 Indonesia, Telephone: +62 21 52921482 Herewith we attach the clarification form our side, hopefully you could consider to change in order to make all bidders have the same chance to bid their equipment without any subjective perception to any brand model. Technical Spesification Row 128 Criteria : Vertical Movement Range, cm, Lowered to at least 55 cm, or lower, from the floor Remark : it is widely accepted that a minimum height of 62 cm can fully meet practical needs. The scanning bed with a minimum height of 62 cm has been extensively validated to successfully meet the needs of various patient groups, including those of different ages and physical conditions. A slightly higher minimum height reduces the need for frequent adjustments and bending by technicians, thereby minimizing fatigue and improving operational efficiency. The design of the 62 cm minimum height is based on a comprehensive consideration of operational convenience, equipment performance, and workflow efficiency: Scanning beds with a greater height range may reach 55 cm, but the descent process is more time-consuming and imposes additional demands on time management for technicians. In contrast, the 62 cm design meets routine clinical application requirements while effectively reducing unnecessary height adjustments and enhancing scanning efficiency. From the client’s perspective, the primary function of a scanning bed is to provide safe, precise, and efficient scanning support. The 62 cm design has shown no negative impact on patient experience or workflow in actual use. Instead, it reduces equipment complexity and operational redundancy, delivering a superior user experience for clients. In conclusion, the 62 cm minimum height design not only meets the technical requirements of the bidding process but also optimizes hospital workflows and improves overall efficiency. We kindly request that you reconsider the strict limitation on minimum height and recognize 62 cm as a reasonable and compliant design solution. Thank you for your understanding and support. We look forward to your positive response! Sincerely, |
Many thanks for this feedback. As this specification is mandatory, the bidder can choose to comply and describe. MoH will retain the current specification. The criteria of at least 55cm for the bed is to accommodate patient accessibility. This minimum height requirement is to assist wheelchair-bound/ handicapped patients to be transferred onto the bed with ease. |
Supply Requirements | Evaluation Process | Technical Evaluation |
| 32 | 2024-11-20 | Dear Sir/Madam, We are sorry for the confusion on the below clarification: Manufacturing Experience in RFB Procurement of PET CT Section III Evaluation and Qualification Criteria: Manufacturing experience and Technical Capacity: For the items under the Contract that the bidder is a manufacturer, the Bidder shall furnish documentary evidence to demonstrate that: (i) it has manufactured CT Simulator à this is supposed to be PET CT for at least seven (7) years, prior to the bid submission deadline; and (ii) its annual production capacity of PET CT for each of the last seven (7) years prior to the bid submission deadline, is at least 50% the quantities specified under each lot. To ensure the tender openness towards larger range of manufacturers, Bidder would like to raise that the technologies represent specialized segments within the broader category of CT scanners. The existing requirements may inadvertently limit participation in the tender process, effectively narrowing the pool of potential bidders to a few large companies, such as XXXX. We believe that revising these requirements to consider the unique expertise and capabilities of smaller, specialized manufacturers could foster a more competitive bidding environment. This would not only encourage innovation but also potentially result in more favorable pricing and options for the Ministry. We respectfully urge the Ministry to reconsider the manufacturing experience criteria for this niche market, allowing a broader range of qualified manufacturers to participate. This approach could enhance the overall quality and availability of advanced imaging technologies within Indonesia. Hopefully PC-5 will still able to provide clarification on the above request. Best regards, |
Many thanks for this feedback. The MoH will retain the current requirements outlined in the bidding document. Bidders are kindly requested to comply and provide the necessary items as per the specified requirements | Bidding Procedure | Evaluation Process | Specific Experience |
No contract award notice uploaded for this lot.
No contract award notice uploaded for this lot.